The "D" word
I was trying to think about when diversity could possibly be a bad thing. Take something like the concept of hot, and one can easily list many instances of when hot is good. By the same taken, one can also go on and on about when hot is not good. Hot car seats, hot lettuce, hot vodka and hot flashes are just a few examples. Diversity on the other hand, hell I can't possibly think of when you could have a negative aspect of diversity.
The reason for my train of thought came about while running through a slightly dodgy part of town. The area is a little run down, and suffers from some poor planning. It is, however in the process of revitalising itself thanks to some changes. I got to thinking about diversity while running through this area, because a friend had mentioned how building densely populated answers wasn't always a good thing in terms of planning. I agree, but density is needed to bring in adequate amounts of people to make a number of things viable. Transportation, a bustling street life and a mix of shops/services. Density by itself would not bring all the aforementioned things, but diversity sure would get you closer to that.
Building diverse living accomodations, diverse building types and trying to keep a mix of ethnicities in an area will all foster the types of places that are worth living, working, playing and being in. There is so much mono everything, and it seems like every time you stop there is a bit more. I say think diversity in everything we do and we'd all be a hell of a lot better. Although, if we all were thinking diversity, could diversity in itself be considered mono?